Law firms · Where to start with AI

Is your firm ready for AI?

For partners deciding where AI should start in the firm. List up to five tasks, answer six questions for each, and see which ones to start with and what holds the others back.

Task 1
Does it come back every week or every month in the same shape?
Can a person check the output in a few minutes?
Does the data already sit in your tools (accounting, CRM, analytics, shared drives)?
Is it a decision with legal or financial weight that nobody reviews?
Is the process written down?
Would client confidential material go into the AI tool?

How this check works

Not covered here

Sources

arelion.dev guides

Texts on client confidential material

Questions

Which law firm tasks should go to AI first?

Tasks that come back every week or every month in the same shape, whose output a person can check in a few minutes, and whose data already sits in the firm's tools. Decisions with legal or financial weight that nobody reviews come later, and so do processes nobody has written down.

Can client confidential documents go into an AI tool?

It depends on where you practise and on the tool. For work in DIFC Courts proceedings, the Courts' guidance asks for the client's consent before confidential information goes into a generative AI tool, and the QFC Court allows confidential information only in private, secure AI platforms. The Saudi conduct rules allow disclosure with the client's written consent, and the UAE Code of Ethics with the written consent of the owner of the information, who is not always the client. Whether an AI provider counts as disclosure is unclear.